Pedro Echeverria (special ARGENPRESS.info)
1 .- The expropriation of one of the two companies of Mexican transnational Gruma by the Venezuelan government of Hugo Chavez caused a stir in Mexico between the government and businessmen. Years ago other Mexican companies such as Cemex, Coca Cola Femsa and Steel Pipes and Mexico were taken over by expropriation or nationalization measures taken by the government of that Haiti.
"nationalization is likely to continue," he said in a report on foreign investment in the region issued last week ECLAC. Can you forget that in 2007, President Chávez announced that the State actions to assume control of its administration sectors considered as "strategic", including food, in a country that suffers continuing shortage of essential commodities like milk and flour Wheat-Venezuela is the second largest consumer of pasta in the world?
2 .- The Chavez government moves serious, with the support of the oil wealth that has been known to use as a political strategy, towards a process of nationalization and socialization each day conquer more sympathy and support of the Venezuelan workers, but also demonstrate to other governments the way forward for using the economic resources the benefit of the population. For these measures nationalization of Chavez, the U.S. government, the media and develop a permanent coryphaei a huge anti-communist campaign. In Mexico, Calderon's rightist government does exactly the opposite: keep the country's wealth by delivering the most powerful businessmen and foreigners while leaving state service health, education, seeks end to privatize oil and electrified, has led to the closure of tens of thousands of micro, small and medium fires while unemployment and poverty.
3 .- Mexico's PRI governments were strong even before the introduction of neoliberal privatization in 1982. In that year the powerful Mexican businessmen-investors associated with Yankee-rebelled against a bank nationalization lópezportillista and demanded the sale of 2500 firms "quasi", ie controlled by the government (oil, electricity, telephones, air transport, steel, railways, Conasupo food, fertilizers, agricultural credit banks, etc.) and De la Madrid, the initiator of the direct corporate policy, had said in his campaign: "It is necessary that" society "(ie private entrepreneurs) retrieves the state has taken. " The "brain" of the campaign of De la Madrid was Salinas de Gortari, the same as replacing its competitors and deepened six years after assuming the presidency neoliberalism.
4 .- Many of those companies operating at a loss, ie with "red" state that it indemnified by public budget, but what hidden or silenced by private employers and the PAN right to criticize the "semi" is that these annual losses were not only the vast corruption of officials, but also those companies subsidizing private businesses providing oil, electricity and transport almost given away, also to the crisis instead of laying off workers are still paying wages to avoid high unemployment. The nanny state, corporate, welfare, held for more than 60 years a great stability in politics, economics, health services, education, for there was fired unemployment, street trade, migration to the U.S., crime or drug trafficking.
5 .- The massive official corruption in Mexico, but also at other times in Venezuela, Brazil, USA and other countries, has been a social ill that has not been eradicated. Have been reported in hundreds of thousands of times state corruption because it manages public money, but you forget that private enterprise is also corrupt to the goods that gives them the state and businesses under their own protection. Chávez has created in Venezuela government agencies to curb corruption which can be as eneficientes as those of Mexico, but until now, in these times of "Venezuelan revolution" seems to have Chavez will finish in constantly calling his people to denounce. The most important thing is to give power and freedom to the people to feel and see that their voice is valid and weigh their actions. A few days ago pursued the business of the body by raising prices.
6 .- Chavez to avoid the big capitalists continue to hide their products and then promote the lean, should continue its policy expropriation. CANTV now controls not only the powerful telephone company but several TV channels, radio and newspapers, which were once the right-are controlled by the state: VTV, Telesur, Avila TV, Live TV, National Assembly, Caracas Radio, Radio Nacional, and so on. All these means are utilized to pass 24-hour national and international news, analysis, editorials, forums, debates, which will undoubtedly help to educate the population from the point of view of socialism Chavez. Obviously Chavez's enemies are using Venevision, Channel 10, Globovisión, Channel 57 and CMD but its impact is minimal because they have no arguments to refute. Devote many hours to pass novels and movies.
7 .- Chávez is serving two fronts: the internal domestic politics and international policy and so is the governor more secure and more threatened by the U.S. empire, it is no coincidence that the last seven bases Colombia military are installed in targeting Venezuela. As suggested by my friends in the PPT: monitor the warlordism and the only party not become a dictatorship that would prevent people-especially political dissidence and ideological develop freely. But it can not be left to recognize that Chavez has gotten into the depths of his people and the measures it has taken expropriatory and constant vigilance exercised against speculation in the prices of basic commodities, it becomes more supportive. Meanwhile collapses Calderon in Mexico, but there is no honest and strong left push it to collapse.
"Break the infamous i tacit pact talking softly. Let the crossroads of the road, i l'ambiguity on the precise word .........." (Manuel González Prada)
0 comments:
Post a Comment